Able Danger: What did Gorelick know, and when did she know it?
This AP story (Congressman: U.S. Intel Knew 9/11 Plotters) providing insight into operation Able Danger should prompt the question, what did Jamie Gorelick know and when did she know it? Remember the calls for her recusal (Update: also here) after John Ashcroft's testimony to the 9/11 Commission? (BTW, remember how the MSM called Ashcroft out for bringing this to the Commissions attention? Here's some help: Mr. Ashcroft's Smear, Critiquing Ashcroft's 9/11 Show)
Able Danger was an important 'dot' with a direct connection to the ultimate hijacking of 4 planes on 9/11/2001. Who would benefit most from this information not being released to the public?
Porkopolis doesn't delve in conspiracies, put this is a fairly big elephant in the room and in light of the circumstances a fair question. It's too convenient that an ongoing initative like Able Danger was not publicly disclosed.
Wouldn't disclosure of Able Danger's existance and the failure to act on it, as adirect (please see Update) indirect (please see Update 2) direct result of Ms. Gorelick's memo, have been an avenue of investigation for the Commission? [Update: Former 9/11 Commissioner Slade Gorton has come to Ms. Gorelick's defense and CQ speculates that Ms. Gorelick's philosophy for the 'wall' may have been established during her tenure in the Defense Department.] [Update 2: CQ makes the case for Gorelick's memo directly influencing Defense Department actions]
If it turns out Ms. Gorelick had absolutely no knowledge whatsoever of Able Danger, let's move on. Nevertheless, the recusal that many asked for was the right thing to do; with the information availalable at the time and even more so now with hindsight.
Hat Tip: WMD
More from: Captains Quarters, Political Musings.net and Angel Dressed in Black.
Able Danger was an important 'dot' with a direct connection to the ultimate hijacking of 4 planes on 9/11/2001. Who would benefit most from this information not being released to the public?
Porkopolis doesn't delve in conspiracies, put this is a fairly big elephant in the room and in light of the circumstances a fair question. It's too convenient that an ongoing initative like Able Danger was not publicly disclosed.
Wouldn't disclosure of Able Danger's existance and the failure to act on it, as a
If it turns out Ms. Gorelick had absolutely no knowledge whatsoever of Able Danger, let's move on. Nevertheless, the recusal that many asked for was the right thing to do; with the information availalable at the time and even more so now with hindsight.
Hat Tip: WMD
More from: Captains Quarters, Political Musings.net and Angel Dressed in Black.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home