Global Temperature: More politics than science
Via EurekAlert:
Related:
Global temperature -- politics or science?
The entire debate about global warming is a mirage. The concept of ‘global temperature’ is thermodynamically as well as mathematically an impossibility, says professor at The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Bjarne Andresen who has analyzed this hot topic in collaboration with professors Christopher Essex from University of Western Ontario and Ross McKitrick from University of Guelph, both Ontario, Canada.
It is generally assumed that the atmosphere and the oceans have grown warmer during the recent 50 years. The reason for this point of view is an upward trend in the curve of measurements of the so-called ‘global temperature’. This is the temperature obtained by collecting measurements of air temperatures at a large number of measuring stations around the Globe, weighing them according to the area they represent, and then calculating the yearly average according to the usual method of adding all values and dividing by the number of points.
Average without meaning
"It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as complicated as the climate of Earth", Bjarne Andresen says, an an expert of thermodynamics. "A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the climate".
He explains that while it is possible to treat temperature statistically locally, it is meaningless to talk about a a global temperature for Earth. The Globe consists of a huge number of components which one cannot just add up and average. That would correspond to calculating the average phone number in the phone book. That is meaningless. Or talking about economics, it does make sense to compare the currency exchange rate of two countries, whereas there is no point in talking about an average ‘global exchange rate’.
If temperature decreases at one point and it increases at another, the average will remain the same as before, but it will give rise to an entirely different thermodynamics and thus a different climate. If, e.g. it is 10 degrees at one point and 40 degrees at another, the average is 25 degrees. But if instead there is 25 degrees both places, the average is still 25 degrees. These two cases would give rise to two entirely different types of climate, because in the former case one would have pressure differences and strong winds, while in the latter there would be no wind.
Many averages
A further problem with the extensive use of ‘the global temperature’ is that there are many ways of calculating average temperatures.
Example 1: Take two equally large glasses of water. The water in one glass is 0 degrees, in the other it is 100 degrees. Adding these two numbers and dividing by two yields an average temperature of 50 degrees. That is called the arithmetic average.
Example 2: Take the same two glasses of water at 0 degrees and 100 degrees, respectively. Now multiply those two numbers and take the square root, and you will arrive at an average temperature of 46 degrees. This is called the geometric average. (The calculation is done in degrees Kelvin which are then converted back to degrees Celsius.)
The difference of 4 degrees is the energy which drives all the thermodynamic processes which create storms, thunder, sea currents, etc.
More politics than science
These are but two examples of ways to calculate averages. They are all equally correct, but one needs a solid physical reason to choose one above another. Depending on the averaging method used, the same set of measured data can simultaneously show an upward trend and a downward trend in average temperature. Thus claims of disaster may be a consequence of which averaging method has been used, the researchers point out.
What Bjarne Andresen and his coworkers emphasize is that physical arguments are needed to decide whether one averaging method or another is needed to calculate an average which is relevant to describe the state of Earth, not tradition.
The currently used method and the consequences drawn from it therefore is more politics than science, they explain.
Related:
- "GORE LIED, PEOPLE CRIED!!!!"
- The Great Global Warming Swindle on Google Video
- Global Warming Consensus, Schmensus: "...over-hyped and an environmental concern of second rank."
- Ohio State Professor of Atmospheric Sciences reports that Antarctic temperatures disagree with climate model predictions
- Shining a little Sunshine on Global Warming Claims
- "Chicken Little may claim the sky is falling. A journalist's job is to check it out."
- "Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide"
- Global Warming Consensus, Schmensus: A must read ten part series in the Canadian National Post
- More Global Warming Consensus, Schmensus
- Global Warming Consensus, Schmensus
- Must See TV: Senator Inhofe to hold hearing on Climate Change and the Media
- Global Warming Gag Order Senators to Exxon: Shut up, and pay up.(HT: BizzyBlog: Quote of the Day: Bjorn Lomborg on the Global Warming Hysteria)
- Renowned Scientist Defects From Belief in Global Warming – Caps Year of Vindication for Skeptics
- See You at the Global Warming Nuremberg
- Senator Inhofe Fisks the Media on Global Warming Coverage
- New York Times is conveniently incomplete in reporting sources of greenhouse gases
- 60 Minutes on melting ice caps on Earth...let's see if they cover Mars' melting ice caps as well
- More evidence of global warming...but probably not where radical environmentalist expected it
- "The Global Warming Bugaboo"
- Coyote Blog: A Skeptics Primer for "An Inconvenient Truth"
- Gore's Hot Air: Flaky Flick Suffers from 'Truth' Decay
- Robert Samuelson: Global Warming's Real Inconvenient Truth
- Greenhouse theory smashed by biggest stone
- Sunshine on Global Warming claims
1 Comments:
US President Tim Kalemkarian, US Senate Tim Kalemkarian, US House Tim Kalemkarian: best major candidate.
Post a Comment
<< Home